Research by a Northumbria University academic is helping an
influential Norwegian Parliamentary Commission investigate and improve
international maritime safety laws.
Northumbria Law School lecturer Craig Laverick’s work and expertise
is also contributing to the debate surrounding the legal case and defence of Francesco Schettino, the master of the Costa Concordia cruise ship that
capsized off the Tuscan island of Giglio in 2012. The disaster cost the lives of 32 people.
Craig and other international experts were approached to
submit a statement to the Norwegian Commission, which as a leading maritime
nation is looking at the role and development of the International Safety
Management (ISM) Code. This seeks to ensure safety at sea as well as prevent
pollution and loss of marine life. Recent high-profile accidents at sea have,
however, called the effectiveness of the Code into question.
Craig’s involvement follows ongoing collaboration with the
Norwegian-based Skagerrak Safety Foundation, which advises the Norwegian and other
governments and is regarded as a leading international voice in maritime
safety. The Foundation has previously raised concerns over Carnival and Costa Cruises’ treatment of Francesco Schettino, and has
urged greater investigation into the safety systems and role of the company as
the owner of the Costa Concordia.
Following his submission, Craig has now been told
he could be called to give evidence to the Norwegian Parliamentary Commission.
He said: “Based on my research and work with the
Skagerrak Foundation I was able to tell the Commission that while the
international maritime community is aware of the ISM Code and its benefits,
enthusiasm for it among seafarers is waning and it is not being used to its
full potential. For example when something goes wrong, it isn’t used to
establish whether the master or the company of a vessel were to blame. National
legislation is used instead, which can lead to issues such as companies
plea-bargaining within the legal process and removing themselves from the full
scrutiny of an investigation. If all the
blame is put on a ship’s master following a disaster, then important information
about the corporate role and any culpability can be overlooked. We see this in
Italy and the Costa Concordia where any mistakes made by the company cannot be
properly considered or addressed. This is not in the interest of safety.
“There is evidence in my research to show this is
having a negative impact on the implementation and effect of the ISM Code. The
Code is an important legal instrument but maybe it is time to look at how it
can be better implemented, better enforced and better used.”
Craig’s research is now looking at how national
criminal law can potentially be used to ensure better implementation of the ISM
Code and act as a means of punishing and deterring offending
